Posts Tagged ‘California Budget; California Tax Changes; Oil Taxes; Tax Credits’

CA Governator Proposes Sales Tax Exemption and Job Growth For Green Tech Industry

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

http:ax//www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_14217759?nclick_check=1

In order to jump-start job growth while incentivizing green tech investment, Governor Schwarzenegger announced a five-prong approach for revitalizing the California economic climate.

The two main components include:

1) a state sales tax exemption for investing in green technology equipment, and

2) an allocation of $500 million from the State Unemployment Compensation Disability Fund to train 140,000 residence and thereby “save or create” 100,000 jobs.

The green tech sales tax exemption is an excellent structure vs. an income tax credit – since the exemption produces an immediate cash-flow benefit whether the taxpayer is profitable or not. 

As an international leader in adopting green technologies, the Governor is attempting to build a more sustainable legislative policy to ensure that struggling businesses are able to cost-justify the more expensive green technologies.

Many tech businesses have established operations in one of the state’s 42 Enterprise Zones to take advantage of existing equipment tax credits for green equipment, technology purchases, as well as core manufacturing/ processing and R&D investment. 

EZ Tax Credits  http://www.blakechristian.com/hiring_tax_credits.html

Eco-Benefits  http://www.blakechristian.com/green_tax_incentives.html

CNN Video and Cal Chamber Comments re: California Proposed Tax Overhaul

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

While the overall plan to restructure the onerous California business and personal tax systems is being welcomed by the business community, there are numerous unanswered questions related to the proposed Business Net Receipts Tax (BNRT) provisions -  the centerpiece of the tax overhaul proposal made by the Commission for 21st Century Economy earlier this month.

View a 5 minute CNN (Local) interview summarizing the new California tax proposal : 

http://hcvt.com/media.aspx

 

Sign up for a December 9th Bureau of National Affairs (BNA) webinar (9:30 – 11:00 PST) exploring the Commission’s California Tax Proposal:

http://tmstore.bna.com/Conferences.aspx

 

 Following is the California Chamber of Commerce Coalition letter summarizing the open issues related to the BNRT provisions.

The bottom line:  the Commission did a thorough job exploring options to overhaul California’s flawed and antiquated tax system; however, more analysis is still needed to fully evaluate how the BNRT will impact the pricing of Calif0rnia goods and services and how the new tax will trickle through the California economy and will the net effect help or hurt economic development and job creation.

 

Following is Cal Chamber’s Tax Committee’s analysis of the BNRT provisions: 

October 14, 2009

 SUBJECT: CONCERNS REGARDING FINAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON THE 21ST CENTURY ECONOMYThe below-listed coalition of employer organizations and businesses supports the recommendation by the Commission on the 21st Century Economy that its final report undergo much further analysis in the special session. In particular, a number of fundamental questions remain about the proposal to adopt a new, untested tax on business, the business net receipts tax (BNRT), to offset revenue losses from flattening the personal income tax and eliminating the corporate income tax and the state portion of the sales tax. st Century Economy in undertaking the difficult task of evaluating our tax system. We support the Commission recommendation of a stronger rainy day fund because we believe that volatility is primarily a spending problem rather than a revenue problem. We also applaud the Commission’s recognition that California’s high personal and corporate income tax rates and taxation of business inputs negatively impacts our economic growth and competitiveness. However, replacing these taxes with a new tax, absent a thorough understanding of its impacts, could have its own set of harmful consequences. Rate and deductions unknown.We are concerned that 1) no tax rate or rate cap is specified in the proposed legislative language, and 2) many questions remain about the nature of the proposed specific deductions. Without this information, businesses will be unable to calculate the impact of the proposed BNRT. Moreover, we are concerned that the proposal indicates the BNRT tax rate will be unknown and change from year to year during the proposed transition phase. This will create uncertainty that is unmanageable for businesses. In order for the Legislature to understand the impact of this tax on companies and industries, the proposal must settle on a precise rate. We believe it is wrong to establish a new tax on businesses that leaves them in the dark about the rate during a transition or any other period. Additionally, the report is ambiguous about who will set the tax rate; we believe this is a clearly legislative function and should not be delegated to an administrative body. No modeling of proposed BNRT rate.We are concerned about the risk that BNRT revenues may substantially deviate from the Commission’s projected estimates, and if so, whether future BNRT rate increases may be required, even exceeding the reputed four percent cap. Because the proposed BNRT base is extremely broad, even a slight rate change could result in significant additional tax liability for companies. Conversely, there appears to be no mechanism to adjust the rate if this tax generates far more revenue than anticipated. Thus, we believe a crucial part of the Legislature’s analysis should be to conduct independent modeling of the BNRT both backward and forward over several economic cycles (about ten years) to determine the ability of the BNRT to generate revenue and stem volatility. Insufficient evidence that BNRT better than our current taxes.We are concerned about the lack of discussion regarding why the BNRT is a preferable tax policy to the current tax system, which is based either on profits, such as the personal and corporate income taxes, or is passed through as a tax on consumption, like the sales tax. By contrast, the BNRT may be imposed upon companies even when they are losing money, and cannot be passed on as a transactions tax. We are concerned that there is insufficient data that such tax burden shift will meet the goal of stemming volatility, let alone the goals of bolstering California’s economy and competitiveness. Danger that BNRT creates winners and losers.We are concerned about the potentially adverse impact of the BNRT on specific economic sectors and that winners and losers will be created. For example, businesses with low profit margins and high employee expenses presumably would be especially hard-hit, as would companies in a loss position. Additionally, it appears the BNRT may shift more of the tax burden onto small businesses, since many are organized as sole proprietors, limited liability companies, Subchapter S corporations, and partnerships, among others, and pay taxes under the personal income tax system. Thus, they would not benefit from elimination of the corporate income tax. BNRT is a tax on employees.As proposed by the Commission, the BNRT would not allow any deductions for the cost of employees, which would mean the BNRT amounts to a tax on employees. We are concerned this will kill California jobs by motivating companies to outsource jobs to other states and nations. Harm to startups.We believe there is a danger that the BNRT will be especially harmful to startups companies, since many could exceed the miniscule small business exemption threshold (for example, because employee costs are not deductible) and consequently still have to pay significant taxes though they have earned no or minimal profits. No other state would do that. California would go from being a start-up incubator to a start-up mortuary. California goods priced out of national and global markets.We are concerned the BNRT will undermine California’s ability to compete with other states and countries if the cost of exported California goods and services becomes substantially higher than those products, such as software, offered by other states and countries. Additionally, the cost of doing business would increase for Californians, due to higher prices for purchases of other business services, such as advertising, accounting and janitorial services. Harm to small businesses and consumers because of services tax.The Commission states that one of the purposes of the BNRT is to expand the tax base to include services. Of course, California services businesses pay all manner of income, payroll, sales, property and excise taxes, so we are concerned that an additional tax on services businesses will kill jobs in industries such as dry-cleaning and auto repair because the new tax will be difficult to pass on as a transactions tax and, if it is passed on, will result in a nearly four percent price jump for consumers. The small business exemption threshold is quite low, so will reflect a relatively narrow segment of the small business universe. Revenues from federal government and out-of-state companies questionable.We are concerned that the cited $6.8 billion in revenues anticipated to be generated from federal deductions and out-of-state companies rests upon unreliable assumptions. Sales taxes paid by businesses are currently deductible from federal taxes and federal income tax liability will increase for taxpayers whose state income taxes are reduced. Moreover, application of the economic presence test to BNRT to create nexus with out-of-state companies is not supported by current case law precedent and could thus be subject to immediate court challenge. And to the extent the BNRT is embedded in the price of goods and services that are “exported” to other states and offshore, this price premium may make these products and services less competitive, which would reduce the overall economic benefit to the state.

TO: Members of the California State Legislature

FROM: Below-Listed Coalition of Employer Organizations and Businesses

 

 

We appreciate the efforts of the Commission on the 21

For example, is it fair and equitable to impose a significant tax even when there is no income, as BNRT would do? The only other major tax similarly unfair was the property tax, which was the subject of a tax October 14, 2009 Page 2 of 4

revolt 30 years ago when it became unaffordable for major parts of California society. High inflation then exacerbated the perceived unfairness of the property tax, which could also be the case for a BNRT.

Absent a full analysis of potential consequences of the BNRT and how it interacts with the other proposed tax changes, it will be impossible for businesses to determine its full implications. Based upon the information provided thus far, however, we have a number of serious concerns about the BNRT proposal which were not fully addressed in the final Commission report. The following are some of the key concerns that we believe should be included and addressed in the Legislature’s analysis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 14, 2009 Page 3 of 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To conclude, we respectfully urge the Legislature to devote substantial time, without the pressure of any arbitrary deadlines, toward: 1) conducting a comprehensive analysis of the impact of replacing our current tax system with the BNRT on California jobs and the economy; and 2) providing businesses and other impacted sectors with the opportunity to review and respond to this analysis of a sufficiently detailed proposal before moving the recommendations in any manner in legislation.

We, in the California business community, strongly believe that, ultimately, the solution to California’s revenue problems will only come from robust economic growth and job creation. Therefore, we believe restoration of jobs and the economy, and the strengthening of California’s competitiveness, should be the top priorities in evaluation of California’s tax system. October 14, 2009 Page 4 of 4

Sincerely,

California Chamber of Commerce

American Council of Engineering Companies of California

American Fire Sprinkler Association – California Chapters

Apartment Association, California Southern Cities, Inc.

Associated Builders and Contractors of California

Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies

Brawley Chamber of Commerce

Building Owners and Managers Association of California

California Aerospace Technology Association

California Apartment Association

California Automotive Wholesalers’ Association

California Bean Shippers Association

California Building Industry Association

California Business Properties Association

California Cable & Telecommunications Association

California Cattlemen’s Association

California Farm Bureau Federation

California Forestry Association

California Grain and Feed Association

California Grocers Association

California Hospital Association

California Hotel and Lodging Association

California Manufacturers and Technology Association

California Pear Growers Association

California Professional Association of Specialty Contractors

California Restaurant Association

California Retailers Association

California Seed Association

California Self Storage Association

California State Floral Association

California Taxpayers Association

California Warehouse Association

Commercial Real Estate Development Association CA Council

Council on State Taxation

El Centro Chamber of Commerce

Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce

International Council of Shopping Centers

Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce

Lumber Association of California and Nevada

Messenger Courier Association of the Americas

Milpitas Chamber of Commerce

National Federation of Independent Business

Pacific Egg and Poultry Association

Pacific Merchant Shipping Association

Personal Insurance Federation of California

Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau

Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce and Convention-Visitors Bureau

Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce

TechAmerica

Western Electrical Contractors Association

Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association

Western States Petroleum Association

California Tax System May Get Radical Surgery

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

The Golden State is terminally ill according to many observers.   As a result of California’s ongoing fiscal problems, a special commission formed by Governor Schwarzenegger earlier this year is pushing forward a major proposal to completely overhaul the personal and business tax structure.

The purpose of the proposed provisions is to “normalize” future tax receipts regardless of economic conditions and also halt the exodus of businesses and high net-worth individuals who are leaving the state in droves to escape some of the highest income and sales tax rates in the country.

The proposed restructuring is pretty dramatic and looks more like combined heart and brain surgery rather than the locally popular face lift and tummy tuck.

The changes proposed in today’s U.C. Berkeley commission meeting include:

       1)  a reduction of all personal tax rates – with the top rate falling from    10.3% to 6.5%,

        2) elimination of the corporate income tax – currently 8.84%,

        3) concurrent establishment of a new “Business Net Receipts Tax” which would apply a tax (details pending) on the net sales and purchases made by businesses,

        4) eliminate (1% per year over 6 years) the current state general purpose sales tax – currently 6%.   Combined with county/ city sales tax rates – the current California sales tax rates exceed 10% in some jurisdictions,

       5) Initiate new “rainy day” reserve fund which the governor has been calling for over the past few years,

      6) Institute a tax appeals dispute resolution process to eliminate the current “stacked deck” known as the State Board of Equalization.

The commission is hoping to advance their final proposal in the next several weeks.

For more information, including descriptions of these far-reaching  proposals, please click on the following link:

http://www.cotce.ca.gov

 

 

 

Following is an overview of the commission’s actions from last week.

Bureau of National Affairs
Commissioners May Endorse California Tax Overhaul if Specific Elements Included
Posted September 11, 2009, 7:10 P.M. ET
LOS ANGELES—Some members of a special commission appear ready to endorse a vast overhaul of the California tax system at a final meeting Sept. 14, but said Sept. 10 they must first be satisfied that their fellow members will address specific reservations they each have about the broad plan.
Members of the Commission on the 21st Century Economy also backed off their original plan to ask lawmakers and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) to take up their recommendations immediately in the form of proposed legislative language and enact them as soon as possible. Instead, commissioners agreed that the changes require more study.
At a lengthy meeting Sept. 10, Chairman Gerald Parsky suggested the commission introduce its final report to the governor and Legislature with an explanation that members believe the package, which centers around a new net receipts tax on businesses, is promising enough to warrant further study. Commissioners are likely to say that lawmakers and the governor should “proceed with a public process” to fully evaluate the proposals, and enact them upon completion of a more thorough review.
At the core of the package are proposals to eliminate the corporate income tax, mostly or completely eliminate the state portion of the sales and use tax, reduce and partially flatten the personal income tax, and impose a new business net receipts tax.

                      ************************************************************************************************

Despite objections from the business community and California Chamber of Commerce  until more details are released, the Commission is pushing hard to release their recommendations this week.  We applaud the thorough efforts of the Commission to improve our state’s dismal tax structure, which is rated near the bottom of every national survey.

Scan down for earlier blog posts regarding the CA Enterprise Zone Program, which can minimize California’s tax bite for many companies until these or other tax revisions are adopted.

Tax Law Changes in California – 9 Billion New taxes planned

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Long Beach Chamber of Commerce Chairman of the Board, Blake Christian CPA, discusses recent California tax law changes on CNN. Gain insight into how these new tax law changes precipitated by the 2008 California state budgets will affect corporates tax incentives. This discussion also highlight the impacts these laws will have on California enterprise zone credits and incentives.

Happy New Year – Governor Schwarzenegger Announces Proposed 2009-2010 State Budget

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

Thanks to Kyla Christoffersen of Cal Chamber for providing the following information.

On December 31st, the Governor announced his 2009-10 proposed budget. You can find a description of the proposed tax increases and revenue raisers, beginning on page 58 of the pdf document.

Download CA Budget Proposal (Dec 31 2008)

Revenue raisers are:

·         Temporary 3-year 1.5?cent increase in the Sales and Use Tax rate (est. to raise $2.35 billion in 2008-09; $7.1 billion in 2009-10)

·         Broaden the Sales and Use Tax base to include certain services – appliance, furniture, and vehicle repair and veterinary services (est. to raise $272 million in 2008-09 and $1.15 billion in 2009-10)

·         Adopt a 9.9?percent Oil Severance Tax (est. to raise $358 million in 2008-08 and $855 million in 2009-10)

·         Increase the Beverage excise tax by a per gallon surtax equivalent to a “nickel?per?drink” (est. to  raise $244 million in 2008-09 and $585 million in 2009-10)

·         Reduce the personal income tax dependent exemption credit to equal the personal exemption credit (est. to raise $1.44 billion in 2009-10)

·         Increase the vehicle registration fees (est. to raise $92 million in 2008-09 and $359 million in 2009-10)

·         Shift Tribal Revenues from Transportation to General Fund.

·         Transfer and borrow balances from special funds.

 

       While these budget proposals are tough to comprehend in the current economic environment, the Governor's proposals are more moderate than many other proposals which have been advanced over the past 12 months. 

       Facing a $40 billion plus budget deficit, the Governor and his staff should be applauded for allowing plenty of lead time to start the budget process since this is such a critical time for all Californians during an unprecedented challenging economic period.

      It will be interesting to see if the legislators can hash out the final budget in a timely and reasonable manner.  

      Read more about how your Califonia tax burden (as well as tax burdens in 40 other states) can be significantly reduced while you are assisting economically challenged communities:

       Download AICPA Tax Rates and Tax Credits

       Download Socially Responsible Tax Planning

       Download CCH LOCATION_BASED_TAX_CREDITS WEBINAR