Archive for the ‘Green/ Eco Credits’ Category

CA Governator Proposes Sales Tax Exemption and Job Growth For Green Tech Industry

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

http:ax//www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_14217759?nclick_check=1

In order to jump-start job growth while incentivizing green tech investment, Governor Schwarzenegger announced a five-prong approach for revitalizing the California economic climate.

The two main components include:

1) a state sales tax exemption for investing in green technology equipment, and

2) an allocation of $500 million from the State Unemployment Compensation Disability Fund to train 140,000 residence and thereby “save or create” 100,000 jobs.

The green tech sales tax exemption is an excellent structure vs. an income tax credit – since the exemption produces an immediate cash-flow benefit whether the taxpayer is profitable or not. 

As an international leader in adopting green technologies, the Governor is attempting to build a more sustainable legislative policy to ensure that struggling businesses are able to cost-justify the more expensive green technologies.

Many tech businesses have established operations in one of the state’s 42 Enterprise Zones to take advantage of existing equipment tax credits for green equipment, technology purchases, as well as core manufacturing/ processing and R&D investment. 

EZ Tax Credits  http://www.blakechristian.com/hiring_tax_credits.html

Eco-Benefits  http://www.blakechristian.com/green_tax_incentives.html

Copenhagen Climate Summit Climax?

Friday, December 18th, 2009

The high expectations for the Copenhagen Eco-Summit looks to be headed for a disappointing climax.

With the email scandal and an unprecedented cold snap hanging over the Summit – protesters and climate change critics have effectivly frozen the world leaders into inaction.

The rift between developed and developing countries regarding shifting of economic resources is also complicating the negotiating process.

The last hope appears to be final meetings between President Obama and Chinese Premiere Jiabao to possibly work out specific carbon limits for their countries.  This appears unlikely in the current economic environment.  But hope (and change) springs eternal.

In order to try and salvage some goodwill from the conference, Secretary of State Clinton announced yesterday a plan for the U.S. to help fund a $100 billion pot of money for developing countries – but the target date in 2020.

For the latest news on the progress made at the Summit, check out the Financial Times articles in the link below:

http://www.ft.com/intl/global-economy

Year-End Tax Planning For Corporations

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

http://www.cpa2biz.com/Content/media/PRODUCER_CONTENT/Newsletters/Articles_2009/CorpTax/YearEnd_Planning.jsp

The link above will provide you with eight significant ways to reduce your 2009 tax burden.

For taxpayers who incurred losses in 2009, the article provides ways to quickly monetize these losses via obtaining refunds through carryback of the losses for up to five years.

More information can be obtained at www.blakechristian.com and www.hcvt.com.

Copenhagen Eco Summit – Green, Gas and Greed

Friday, December 4th, 2009

As the world’s eyes turn toDenmark as world leaders, scientists and activists meet to discuss future emission standards in developed and developing countries, there is mounting focus on the U.S., China and India .

There is also continuing fall-out from the release of thousands of emails from environmental scientists, which indicate that certain historical data that calls into question global warning trends was either supressed or destroyed.

A recently released study by the well respected consulting firm McKinsey discusses how there are numerous, relatively low-cost, methods to reduce carbon emmissions – including increasing the use of low-energy lighting, hybrid and other alternative fuel vehicles, as well as building and retro-fitting residential and commercial buildings. 

These “low-hanging fruit” startegies are projected to have a quick and significant reduction in carbon emmissions vs. many of the more expensive and longer-term technologies such as conversion to nuclear, wind, etc.

Financial Times (U.K) has an impressive interactive set of maps and charts to show historical and projected emission patterns:

Click on the “Continue to Features” link on the photo in the attached link:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d0940004-c7d5-11de-8ba8-00144feab49a.html.

Obama Jobs Summit – Real Results or More Smoke & Mirrors

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

With trillion dollar deficits and national unemployment in excess of 10% (before factoring in employees forced into part-time positions and those terminally unemployed), President Obama is under significant pressure to create the jobs he promised during the campaign.

Interestingly the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was not invited to the Summit – even though the Chamber represents over 3,000,000 businesses throughout the U.S.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/02/obama-policy-critics-not-invited-to-jobs-summit/

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlantans-others-head-to-222929.html

While various corporate tax incentives, including hiring credits are being considered as part of the Summit, there are already a myriad of federal and state tax incentives which provide annual hiring credits ranging from $500 to $15,000 per “qualified” employee hired.  Many of these programs are Location-Based Incentive Credits (LBICs), requiring the business to be located in specific economically disadvantaged regions (over 8,000).  In addition there are a number of programs which can generate hiring credits regardless of the business location.

Hopefully the Administration will explore and add additional hiring credits.   Congress and the states should also invest funds to improve the marketing and education of the existing federal and state hiring credit programs to make sure employers understand that they can dramatically reduce their labor costs on new hires – as well as some employees hired in prior years.  Read more about these valuable incentives @: www.blakechristian.com

 

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich held his own “Real” Jobs Summit today to highlight his proposed fixes.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125980635501974009.html

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34637

 

Republican Congressman Boehner’s job creation/ retention letter to the President can be found at:

http://www.employernation.org/letter.aspx?utm_source=whereoware&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=OpenLetter-Prosp-Dec09

 

Rebuilding Global Prosperity – Wall Street Journal CEO Council Recommendations

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

We all seem to enjoy second-guessing other people’s decisions – particularly if it involves any decision by Congress or Presidents Bush or Obama in the last few years.

Well now a group of CEOs, representing millions of workers and over $2 trillion of combined market capitalization, had that opportunity to make their opinions known to the business community, as well as the Obama Administration and Congress (assuming they are still open to input from us pesky voters).

Last week the Wall Street Journal gathered 100 CEO’s from a cross-section of large cap companies.  The purpose of this CEO Council was to develop a consensus on how the Obama Administration should prioritize their national and global agendas for the good of the economy and the good of the country.

According to WSJ.com: “The CEOs divided into four task forces and debated priorities in the areas of health care, energy and the environment, finance and the U.S. economy, and education. Using an electronic ranking system devised by the Journal, they chose five top priorities in each subject area.”

The summarized priorities are accessible at the link below:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704204304574543633148686184.html

 

The full CEO Council reports and a list of CEO Council participant can be accessed at:

http://online.wsj.com/public/page/ceo-council-112309.html

Climate Change Experts Provide Wide-Ranging Perspectives (Financial Times/ UK)

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

Ten Leading Climate Change Experts Share Their Views With the Financial Times Editors

 Interesting cross-section of perspectives from 10 leading climate change experts –

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/f1d9f856-d4ad-11de-a935-00144feabdc0.html

These experts’ personal carbon footprints don’t appear to be material lower than the average individual – but probably a small fraction of Al Gore’s.

 Sounds like they interviewed these experts before the announcement that they will not come to any firm agreement in Copenhagen.

 

Hackers access hundreds of climate change emails (Guardian/ UK)

Computer files were apparently accessed earlier this week from servers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, a world-renowned centre focused on the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.

These emails have not yet been authenticated but may raise many questions regarding the underlying data and science behind various environmental reports from the Climate Research Unit and other leading climate change organizations.

Stay tuned.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/20/climate-sceptics-hackers-leaked-emails

Gas vs. Electric – Nissan Chief Predicts Slow EV Adoption

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Carlos Ghosn, head of the Nissan-Renault alliance predicts that only 10% of vehicles will be powered by electricity in 2020.

Despite consumer and political support to move away from carbon-based fuel sources for our vehicles, Mr. Ghosn’s observations will undoubtedly draw some fire from the alternative fuel industries.

An uptick in oil prices, increased taxes on petroleum products and/ or other government intervention could dramatically accelerate the adoption of  electric and other alternative fuel vehicles.

http://http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Nissan-chief-Electric-car-apf-1767529708.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&ccode=

2009 California Enterprise Zone Conference

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Before reading what happened at the 2009 CAEZ Conference, read the following update on the effectiveness of the EZ program and the latest debate on whether the USC EZ study or the UCI EZ study is the most accurate, as well as the latest legislative proposals:

http://www.ezpolicyblog.com/dr-swenson-responds/

The USC study concluded that job growth, real estate values and incomes rose in EZ’s and surrounding areas.  The USC study examined precise EZ borders, detailed employment data, salary and unemployment data as well as real estate values.  

The UCI concluded that there was no measurable increase in job creation within EZ’s.   However, the UCI study limited their analysis to job creation and used employment data from credit rating agencies, which generally measure job retention and creation via ranges for different size businesses – e.g. 0-5, 6 – 10, 11-20, etc.   Therefore, if an employer with 12 employees hired 5 new employees, they would fall within the 11-20 employee range and no net job increase or decrease  would be reported.  Obviously this skews the data. 

Another flaw in the UCI study is that they used incomplete and dated borders in defining highly specific EZ regions.  The EZ borders are very Gerrymandered and defined by census tracts; however, the UCI study used other criteria including zip codes to build their database for measuring job growth.

 

http://www.caez.org/Conference-2009/index.html

The annual California Association of Enterprise Zone (CAEZ) conference was held last week in Fresno, California.

The host committee executed a very informative and well-paced conference which was attended by over 160 attendees from Enterprise Zone cities throughout the state. 

Key attendees and speakers included:

     – John Nunn, HCD Enterprise Zone Program Director, attended all sessions and participated in a number of panel presentations.  Mr. Nunn provided the attendees frank and detailed information regarding the administration of the program on a historical basis and the changes he envisions for the future.   The thrust of Mr. Nunn’s remarks wast to encourage Zone Administrators and EZ consultants to communicate with HCD, FTB, legislators and other CAEZ members to document successes in their regions and develop improved economic development, workforce development and program effectiveness procedures.

James Dudley, Franchise Tax Board -  Enterprise Zone Director, discussed various settled and pending Enterprise Zone cases and the logistics of the Enterprise Zone audit process.   Mr. Dudley provided some useful information, but being realtively new in this role, he was a bit reserved in providing specific detail regarding the FTB’s processes or positions.

Assemblymember V. Manuel Perez, Chairman Jobs, Economic Development and Economy (JEDE) provided very positive comments about the work of the CAEZ board and members to preserve and expand the EZ program.  Assemblymember Perez discussed the many ways the EZ program benefits business owners in his district, as well as businesses and employees throughout the state.  Mr. Perez also cautioned the members that the legislators will require more accountability and refinements to the program to ensure that the taxpayers are getting an adequate return on their $300 million/ year investment in the program.  While there are studies which clearly show that employment, poverty and property values improve in incentive zones, conflicting studies, and legislative skepticism will require members to improve documentation and communication with their legislators.  He also cautioned us to anticipate some moderate reduced benefits in any final EZ legisaltion next year.

State Senator Roderick Wright -  Senator Wright provided us a highly entertaining keynote lunch speech which included a fascinating history of why California manufaturers have exited the state since the 1960′s.  Senator Wright provided a real insiders view of  Sacramento politics and how the legislators need to take a firmer stance against the tax-and-spend policies of the past few decades.

 

Toni Symonds, Assembly Consultant and EZ Expert discussed the outcome of the three JEDE legislative hearings, her excellent EZ whitepaper and the 100+ suggestions for improvement/ refinement to the EZ program which came out of the hearings.  The theme was for members to increase their pro-active communication to legislators, be open-minded with respect to reasonable refinements to the program  and share best-practices with other members.

In summary – the EZ program is alive and well, and the JEDE, HCD, FTB and CAEZ are all working together to spread the word to businesses in the 42 California Enterprise Zones and work to improve certaqin aspects of the EZ Program.   Documenting Program effectiveness will also continue to be at the top of all parties’ agendas.

 

Additional information can be obtained at:

http://www.ezpolicyblog.com/jede-committee-hearing-1082009-part-3/

Green Tech Investments Yield Golden Tax Breaks

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

Going Green – Without Breaking the Bank

 

Despite the challenging economy and related capital market gyrations, business owners across the country are continuing to invest in a variety of eco-friendly technologies.  Businesses that choose to invest in green technologies do so for a variety of reasons including: 

-     Being socially responsible, 

-     Reducing long-term operating costs, 

-     Public relations/ employee relations benefits, 

-     Securing tax benefits 

-     Or most likely a combination of these factors. 

A sampling of the type of investments that business owners are making to reduce their energy costs, as well as their carbon footprint , include: 

-         Developing their own power sources, such as solar, cogeneration, geothermal, etc.,

-         Purchasing more energy efficient office and processing equipment,

-         Acquiring alternative powered vehicles,

-         Installing pollution control and energy control systems,

-         Adopting or improving their office and plant recycling programs,

-         Using more renewable raw materials and supplies,

While great strides are being made to reduce the carbon footprints of businesses and individuals, these new eco-friendly shoes can come at a very high price.   Many technologies are still being proven in the marketplace, and proven technologies such as solar, LNG powered vehicles, and LEEDS certified buildings require significant investment and long-term pay-back.

As positive as these eco investments are on the environment and the communities these businesses operates in, business owners will still naturally look to the lowest cost method for greening their business.  Unfortunately, sometimes this means deferring the planned upgrades until cash flow is sufficient to justify the significant up-front costs.

On the bright side, there are a large number of federal and state tax incentives, including eco-credits such as energy and pollution control tax incentives, hiring credit incentives research & development credits and accelerated depreciation benefits (through December 31, 2009) readily available to a large cross-section of industries.  The combination of state and federal credits, and bonus/ section 179 asset write-offs can dramatically reduce the after-tax cost of green infrastructure.

Energy Incentives (Just a Sampling)

-         Federal Solar Credit of 30% on Solar Panels and related equipment,

-         Federal Small Wind Energy Credit of 30% (Maximum Rating of 100 kilowatts),

-         Cogeneration energy production from alternative fuel sources – 30% federal credit

-         Alternative Fueling Stations, including electric recharging stations – federal credit equal to the lesser of: i) 50% of the eligible costs, or ii) $50,000 per station.  More pricey hydrogen station credit caps are increased to the lesser of: 30% or $200,000 per station.  See: www.carbondayautomotive.com  for more info on plug-in recharging stations.

-         Hybrid or Electric Vehicles – $2,500 to $15,000 per electric vehicle purchased or a 10% credit for conversion costs to convert a conventional or hybrid vehicle to a plug-in electric format.  The pay-back period can be relatively quick at $3 per gallon,

-         Federal bonus depreciation at 50% of asset costs and IRC Section 179 “expensing” of most tangible personal property for assets purchased by December 31, 2009 also offer significant up-front tax advantages,

-         Federal and state Research & Development costs for developing or refining new equipment or processes

For companies that design, manufacture, assemble or distribute green technology products, some of the largest tax incentives come in the form of Location Based Incentive Credits (LBICs) which are available to most companies operating in any of the over 8,000 federal, state and local tax incentive zones throughout the country.   Therefore, companies are very wise to carefully choose where they establish or expand their business in order to minimize their federal and state tax burdens.

A small sampling of the 40 state and numerous federal LBIC programs  include:

-         The California Enterprise Zone Program (www.caez.org) available in 42 Zones throughout the state, which offers:

  •  hiring credits up to $13,000 per year/ per qualified employee
  • equipment credits up to 10.75% on pollution control, energy control, technology, manufacturing and processing equipment used exclusively in a Zone,
  • lender tax exemption for loans to businesses operating exclusively in a Zone
  • Employee-Level credits up to $525
  • Favorable permitting, bidding, grants and loans

-         Florida Enterprise Zone Program available in numerous regions throughout the state provides benefits including: hiring credits, equipment tax breaks, sales tax benefits, and property tax reductions,

  -         Federal Empowerment Zone Program (up to $3,000 per qualified employee/ per year)

-         Federal Renewal Community Program (up to $1,500 per qualified employee/ per year)

-         Federal Rural Renewal County Program (up to $4,800 per qualified employee/ per year)

-         Federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) Program available to business operating in any location – from $2,400 to $4,800 per qualified employee and up to $8,500 for Welfare-to-Work employees.

Federal and state grants and more liberal loans are also available for these assets.

 Businesses that either purchase or sell energy and pollution control equipment and spend the time educating themselves on the very beneficial green/ eco credits, state enterprise zone programs, federal tax incentive programs, can enhance their cash flow and profits and will gain significant competitive advantages. 

Read additional green tech blog entries below or review the article library at: www.blakechristian.com.

For more information on identifying Location Based Incentive Credit Zones, please refer to: www.ntcgtax.com.