Archive for the ‘General Business Matters’ Category

Creative Accounting “Creates or Saves” More Jobs

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Apparently the best defense is a good offense — or at least an offensive method of accounting. 

The Obama administration has decided it is easier to develop a totally new method for quantifying job creation, rather than try and correct the numerous errors documented over the the first 11 months of last year.

The revised accounting method allegedly yields 640,000 jobs “tied” to federal stimulus projects.  The new methods simply traces federal funds which pay salaries of either existing or new employees working on federally funded stimulus projects.

This methodology appears to be helpful in helping the administration meet its highly publicized (and problematic) promise  to “save or create” 3.5 million jobs during President Obama’s first term.

The continuing challenge for the U.S. and the world is double-digit unemployment — which may take some time to reduce.

Summary of new methodology

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34830451/ns/business-stocks_and_economy     

Access all the details on Recovery.Gov

http://www.recovery.gov/OPPORTUNITIES/Pages/Jobs.aspx

Senate Delivers a Sack of Coal (Plus More Taxes) For Christmas

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

Just in time for the Holidays, the Senate passed their version of healthcare reform.

Don’t spend that cash and those gift cards you receive for the Holidays — you may need them for living expenses, your shrinking paycheck  or increased insurance premiums very soon.

Now the real work will begin for the Conference Committee to hammer out a reconciliation of the House and Senate versions and come up with a final bill that can pass both houses.

$398 Billion in New Taxes: You may need to spend some time studying this information to figure out how these bills are purportedly going to save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade.   If you make more than $200,000 annually, use medical devices, require presription drugs, pay medical premiums, or own a business (that should cover the vast majority of you) you might be subject to one or more of the following:

 - 5.4% surtax on your taxable income above $500,000,

- 2.5% excise tax on medical devices,

-40% excise tax on “High Cost” insurance plans, 

- 62% increase (from 1.45% to 2.35%) in the hospital portion of payroll taxes for taxpayers making more than $500,000,

- penalties ranging from $750 per individual to 8% of payroll on companies and individuals for not having health coverage,

- numerous proposed fees on medicines, drugs and procedures,

- 10% tax on indoor tanning salons (no tax proposed on beachs YET).

Tort reform and healthy living incentives seem to be in short supply in both bills.

And all of these taxes will be collected a few years before the revised healthcare coverage goes into effect – so even though the government has never been able to save more than they spend – it is much easier when they sock away your money (vs. theirs).

Don’t be too upset with Congress though, your state representatives will be looking for new ways to tax you to cover the billions of dollars the feds will be shifting to the state level via Medicaid revisions.

The family gatherings over the next few days will be a great opportunity to educate your family members about what is really in these two pieces of legislation and encourage everyone to reach out to their representatives to ensure that their voices are heard.

Following is a link to a nice Reuters article which summarizes the House and Senate versions:

FACTBOX – Major Differences in the Seanate and House Bills – http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2317087220091224

Here are some other links to inform you of the impact on business and individuals and to highlight some of the issues which your congressional representatives may not be sharing with you:

Wall Street Journal – Businesses Brace For Health Bill’s Costs:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126153353820802365.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories

WSJ – Key Numbers – http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/12/24/the-senate-health-care-bill-six-key-numbers/

WSJ Blog – Reactions From Doctors/ Industry – http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/12/24/senate-bill-reactions-from-doctors-insurers-business-etc/

U.S. Chamber Denounces Passage of Healthcare Bill:

http://www.uschamber.com/press/releases/2009/december/091224_healthsenate.htm

Financial Times (UK) – The Honest Case For a Bungled Healthcare Reform:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1db42944-ed8e-11de-ba12-00144feab49a.html

Congressman Ed Royce Reacts to Government Takeover of Healthcare:

http://royce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=164511

Senate Advances $873 Billion Healthcare Bill

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

Early Monday morning the U.S. Senate agreed to advance their version of Healthcare reform.  The action highlighted the partison divide with 58 Democrats and 2 Independants voting to advance the bill and all 40 Republican Senators voting “nay”.

Despite the purported cost savings, the bill contains 12o references to “tax increases” and the latest version includes a last-minute Harry Reid insertion which bumped the Social Security payroll tax increase from the originally proposed .5% increase to .9%.  This increase is not set to become effective until 2013 – leapfrogging the end of Obama’s initial 4-year term to minimize this being an election-year issue. 

The cumualtive tax increases are estimated to total over $500 billion.

Read more about the payroll tax increases in the attached TheHill.com article:

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/73067-final-senate-health-bill-steepens-payroll-tax-for-high-earners

 

The House and Senate versions must now be reconciled in Conference Committee and this will be a very contentious process.

Stay tuned for the continuing circus.

 

 

 

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-enlargePic07.html?project=imageShell07&bigImage=wsj_healthpol091220.gif&h=569&w=959&title=WSJ.COM&thePubDate=20080826

Stocks vs. Bonds – After Tax Yields Depend on Your State (of Mind)

Monday, December 14th, 2009

http://finance.yahoo.com/focus-retirement/article/108361/stocks-vs-bonds-tax-strategies-state-by-state?mod=fidelity-managingwealth

As reflected in the article link above, taxpayer returns on stock and muni-bond portfolios can change dramatically from state-to-state.  Most states tax capital gains at “ordinary” tax rates rather than at more beneficial capital gains tax rates –as is done under the federal tax system.

Therefore, taxpayers in high tax states such as  CA, OR, NY and NJ may benefit from having a heavier weighting in munis, while lower tax residents may prefer a heavier weighting in municipal bonds.

Variables which will impact the design of the optimal portfolio, include capital loss carryovers, itemized deductions, and income from wages, flow-through entities, and interest and dividends.

Obama Jobs Summit – Real Results or More Smoke & Mirrors

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

With trillion dollar deficits and national unemployment in excess of 10% (before factoring in employees forced into part-time positions and those terminally unemployed), President Obama is under significant pressure to create the jobs he promised during the campaign.

Interestingly the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was not invited to the Summit – even though the Chamber represents over 3,000,000 businesses throughout the U.S.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/02/obama-policy-critics-not-invited-to-jobs-summit/

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlantans-others-head-to-222929.html

While various corporate tax incentives, including hiring credits are being considered as part of the Summit, there are already a myriad of federal and state tax incentives which provide annual hiring credits ranging from $500 to $15,000 per “qualified” employee hired.  Many of these programs are Location-Based Incentive Credits (LBICs), requiring the business to be located in specific economically disadvantaged regions (over 8,000).  In addition there are a number of programs which can generate hiring credits regardless of the business location.

Hopefully the Administration will explore and add additional hiring credits.   Congress and the states should also invest funds to improve the marketing and education of the existing federal and state hiring credit programs to make sure employers understand that they can dramatically reduce their labor costs on new hires – as well as some employees hired in prior years.  Read more about these valuable incentives @: www.blakechristian.com

 

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich held his own “Real” Jobs Summit today to highlight his proposed fixes.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125980635501974009.html

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34637

 

Republican Congressman Boehner’s job creation/ retention letter to the President can be found at:

http://www.employernation.org/letter.aspx?utm_source=whereoware&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=OpenLetter-Prosp-Dec09

 

Dubai World – From Financial Darling to Financial Dog

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

 

Whether Dubai World’s technical default on $60B of debt will have a deep and lasting impact on world markets and commercial real estate values will take some time to sort out.  

But it is safe to say that last week’s revelation that the shining star in the oil-rich Middle East has major cash flow issues will cast a long shadow on the credit markets and stock market for the next few months.

Read the Financial Times Article:http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/fe4b634e-dd14-11de-ad60-00144feabdc0.html

Rebuilding Global Prosperity – Wall Street Journal CEO Council Recommendations

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

We all seem to enjoy second-guessing other people’s decisions – particularly if it involves any decision by Congress or Presidents Bush or Obama in the last few years.

Well now a group of CEOs, representing millions of workers and over $2 trillion of combined market capitalization, had that opportunity to make their opinions known to the business community, as well as the Obama Administration and Congress (assuming they are still open to input from us pesky voters).

Last week the Wall Street Journal gathered 100 CEO’s from a cross-section of large cap companies.  The purpose of this CEO Council was to develop a consensus on how the Obama Administration should prioritize their national and global agendas for the good of the economy and the good of the country.

According to WSJ.com: “The CEOs divided into four task forces and debated priorities in the areas of health care, energy and the environment, finance and the U.S. economy, and education. Using an electronic ranking system devised by the Journal, they chose five top priorities in each subject area.”

The summarized priorities are accessible at the link below:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704204304574543633148686184.html

 

The full CEO Council reports and a list of CEO Council participant can be accessed at:

http://online.wsj.com/public/page/ceo-council-112309.html

Climate Change Experts Provide Wide-Ranging Perspectives (Financial Times/ UK)

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

Ten Leading Climate Change Experts Share Their Views With the Financial Times Editors

 Interesting cross-section of perspectives from 10 leading climate change experts –

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/f1d9f856-d4ad-11de-a935-00144feabdc0.html

These experts’ personal carbon footprints don’t appear to be material lower than the average individual – but probably a small fraction of Al Gore’s.

 Sounds like they interviewed these experts before the announcement that they will not come to any firm agreement in Copenhagen.

 

Hackers access hundreds of climate change emails (Guardian/ UK)

Computer files were apparently accessed earlier this week from servers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, a world-renowned centre focused on the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.

These emails have not yet been authenticated but may raise many questions regarding the underlying data and science behind various environmental reports from the Climate Research Unit and other leading climate change organizations.

Stay tuned.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/20/climate-sceptics-hackers-leaked-emails

Federal Stimulus Spending – Real Job Creation or Government Smoke & Mirrors?

Sunday, November 1st, 2009

Last week the Administration announced their revised figure for jobs “created” and “saved” as a result of the $787 billion federal stimulus package approved earlier this year.

As reflected in the New York Times article linked below, over half of the 640,000 saved or created jobs cited by the government have been in the education sector.   Only 80,000 jobs are tied to construction – which was originally the centerpiece of the stimulus package – but that portion of the spending was ultimately whittled down to only about 15% of the total package – so the job output is in that same range.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/us/31stimulus.html

 

The ongoing controversy is how the government is defining and measuring  “saved” and “created” jobs.  From the point in time that the Administration promised that the stimulus plan would save or create 3 million jobs, taxpayers and economists have asked for details as to how this will be measured.  For now it is a moving target with vague explanations.

California, New York and Washington had the highest number of jobs created or saved.  For additional details regarding the state-by-state and sector-by-sector job results thus far, check out the government website below:

http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx

 

On Monday November 2nd, President Obama attempted to temper the expectations regarding job growth by stating that job losses will continue for the next weeks and months and pressed the public and private sectors to become more creative to increase hiring.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Obama-Private-public-sectors-apf-1954366305.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=5&asset=&ccode=

Stay tuned……

Build America Bonds – Stimulating State & Local Infrastructure Projects

Sunday, November 1st, 2009

As part of the 2009 tax stimulus plan, congress approved three types of financing tools which offer investors tax-effective investment returns, and/or reduced financing costs for the issuer of the bonds.

The tax credit bonds include tax credits which can be used to offset both “regular” federal income tax as well as federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).

Since the credit earned is 35% of the interest income received, taxpayers in the AMT, or taxpayers in marginal tax rates lower than 35% will generally obtain even greater benefits.

Develelopers, government agencies and construction companies view Build America Bonds as a very effective financing tool.

 http://www.cpa2biz.com/Content/media/PRODUCER_CONTENT/Newsletters/Articles_2009/CorpTax/Build_America.jsp